
Allergy & DermatologyALK-Abello Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy Vaccine (SLIT)
ALK-Abello Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy Vaccines Traditionally, allergy vaccination has been achieved through the use of a program of Injections administered according to a standard Protocol (or Regime or Scheme). This is known as Sub-Cutaneous Immunotherapy; SCIT. There is however an alternative form of vaccine administration that has been introduced to clinicians in various countries around the world and has become the standard vaccine form in several European countries. In the early 1990s ALK-Abelló was the first manufacturer to introduce Sub-Lingual Immuno-Therapy (SLIT). The early SLIT products were based on the same principle of an Initial Phase of increasing number of drops (1 to 10 drops over a period of 10 days) of the Vaccine solution under the tongue, followed by daily doses of the Maintenance Phase volume of 10 drops. More recently, however, after increasing experience and documentation and experimentation, the new single dose product was launched in five European countries in 2005. The product and protocol is more convenient to use than the other SLIT products in the world market as there is no up-dosing; simply a fixed dose of 0.2ml (= approx 5-6 drops) once per day of a single potency, from Day 1 and the same every day for 3 years. Due to its great simplicity, compliance is therefore as good as can possibly be achieved for this patient administered treatment. The clinical effect of SLIT has been shown in an increasing number of studies to be good, the safety profile excellent, compliance good, only mild adverse reactions (such as buccal itching), and in total very acceptable for patients, even including paediatric cases and controlled asthmatic cases. In many European countries SLIT is now as popular and if not more popular than SCIT amongst Allergists and patients. For examople, in Europe as a whole, approximately half of all new patients going on to allergen immunotherapy utilise either Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy Drops or the latest generation Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy Tablets. In Italy this percentage is as high as 70%. There is increasing acceptance amongst Specialist Allergists in Australasia, mirroring the great acceptance and usage in many parts of Europe. The World Allergy Organisation has in December 2009 published a Position Paper on Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy, that reviews all the medical research and publications, and makes the latest recommendations. It is in general very suportive of SLIT as a treatment modaility that is every bit as effective as the Injection Immunotherapy but with far greater Safety and Convenience. There are several advantages with Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy in principle.
There is however a major disadvantage to Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy; the cost of the Sub-Lingual Vaccine is approximately four times greater than for the Injection Vaccine, (at approximately $2,800 compared to $700) for the full three year course of treatment. The reasons for the greater cost are many, but principally because the concentration of the allergen in the Sub-Lingual Vaccine needs to be many times greater due to the less efficient method of buccal absorption compared to injection. Also the SLIT vaccines are newer and so more expensive to develop and their period since launch has not allowed the recoupment of the earlier costs.
However, the increased cost to the patient of the Vaccine product itself is largely offset by the great reduction in costs for the doctor’s visits and the cost of the injections and the costs of inconvenience of more than 50 doctor visits over 3 years. In fact, the total cost for the three year course of Immunotherapy by Sub-Lingual drops can indeed be not so much greater than for Injection Immunotherapy. Further details of prices and costs are available on request.
Note that due to the vastly better Safety Profile of SLIT compared to Injection Vaccines, then therapy for Grass Pollen-allergic patients can be ongoing and even be started during the Pollen Season. One other important factor with Sub-Lingual immunotherapy is Patient Compliance. If the three year course is not completed then the clinical benefit is proportionately reduced. Similarly, a patient must take the daily dose every day regularly, in order to achieve the required stimulation of the immune system. The latest dosage schedule for Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy Vaccines as nutilised by the ALK-Abello Sub-Lingual Vaccine means that the patient starts on Day 1 with the regular dosage of 0.2ml (= approx 5-6 drops) from the single-use plastic ampoule, and continues daily with one ampoule per day for the full three years of the treatment course. There is therefore no up-dosing, so there is no need to change the volume of the dose, or to change the strength of the solution, or any other calculations or manipulations. This great simplicity means minimal errors or missed doses. It is also very easy for a parent to check a child's usage; by counting the unused sachets & ampoules compred to the scheduled usage. The relative advantages and disadvantages of Sub-Lingual immunotherapy Vaccines compared to Injection Vaccines should be discussed with a Specialist Allergist. A list of Specialist Allergists in Australia is available at http://www.allergy.org.au.
There are two different commercial brands of Sub-Lingual Immunotherapy vaccine available in Australia (and New Zealand). The statements above are pertinent to the SLIT vaccine manufactured by ALK-Abello and distributed in Australia by AMS.
Steve Lee Allergy Division Manager Mob: 0448-022855 Tel: 02-9882 3666 Fax: 02-9882 3999 E-mail: slee@amsl.com.au Last updated 19th May 2010
|